Abstract
Summary Contract farming (CF) arrangements have the potential to address market failures and improve technology adoption, productivity, and welfare. In Ghana, government and donors use CF as a strategy for increasing adoption of new agricultural technologies and developing value chains. Yet to date, there has not been a rigorous assessment of these CF schemes. The focus in this paper is on different maize-based CF schemes in the poorest and most remote region in Ghana. It assesses the profitability and potential impact of these CF schemes, utilizing a unique plot-level dataset that covers two periods of data and two maize plots (scheme and non-scheme) per household, and employing matching techniques and an instrumental variable approach to address selection bias and unobserved heterogeneity across farmers. These are complemented by a community-level survey, in-depth interviews with scheme operators, and a series of key informant interviews. Results show that these schemes led to improved technology adoption and yield increases. In addition, a subset of maize farmers with high yield improvements due to CF participation have high profits. Maize CF schemes also enabled market coordination and consistent supply of quality maize to downstream industries. However, on average, the impact of the CF schemes on profitability is negative, even when input diversion is accounted for. Yield increases are not high enough to compensate for higher input requirements and the cost of capital under the schemes. Despite higher yields, the costs to produce one metric tonne of maize under CF schemes are higher than on maize farms without CF schemes, twice that of several countries in Africa, and more than seven times higher than that of major maize-exporting countries (the United States, Brazil, and Argentina). Sustainability of these CF schemes will largely depend on developing and promoting much-improved varieties and technologies that boost yields in order to compensate for the high input and credit costs.
Highlights
Contract farming arrangements (CFAs) have become an increasingly popular institutional tool to ensure the quality and quantity of inputs or raw materials for processors, exporters, distributors, and supermarkets
This paper aims to provide insights as to whether CFAs have a role in a highly commercial but not high-value crop such as maize and to clarify under what conditions CFAs can contribute to value chain development and farmers’ welfare
This study focuses on the Upper West region in Ghana, where outgrower schemes were concentrating at the time of the survey
Summary
Contract farming arrangements (CFAs) have become an increasingly popular institutional tool to ensure the quality and quantity of inputs or raw materials for processors, exporters, distributors, and supermarkets. Farmers enter into these CFAs to gain access to informal credit in the form of inputs and to assure a market for their harvests, especially in areas with market failures. There is considerable attention on CFAs in agricultural value chains, where quality concerns require greater coordination and where failures in output, input, and credit markets persist, especially in developing countries. These arrangements seem to be a win-win strategy for buyers and farmers. A knowledge gap remains on the conditions in which CFAs can make an impact on incomes and welfare
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
