Limitations in the interpretation of rest-exercise ejection fraction changes after early thrombolytic therapy during acute myocardial infarction

Abstract

The effect of exercise on left ventricular wall motion in the infarct and noninfarct regions, and their contribution to the global ejection fraction response to exercise was evaluated in 24 patients studied at least 2 weeks following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. To achieve this goal, a nonstandard protocol was used: contrast ventriculography was performed at rest and immediately following 3 minutes of supine bicycle exercise at 50 watts. Wall motion in the infarct and noninfarct regions was measured using the centerline method. The global ejection fraction response to exercise correlated poorly with the exercise response of motion in the infarct region (r = 0.38). In 15 of the 24 patients, the function of the infarct and noninfarct regions changed in opposing directions, and in only 8 (53%) of these did the global ejection fraction response follow the exercise response of motion in the infarct region. The motion of the noninfarct region was the predominant influence on the ejection fraction response in the other 7 patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that the global ejection fraction response was more dependent on the response of motion in the anterior wall (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) than in the inferior wall (r = 0.16), regardless of infarct location. The regional wall motion response to exercise also better distinguished reperfused from nonreperfused patients than did the ejection fraction response. These results indicate that the global ejection fraction response to exercise may be an unreliable indicator of the functional status of the infarct region. The efficacy of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in salvaging myocardium is more accurately evaluated from the rest-exercise change in regional wall motion.