Abstract
We have prepared the following response to the letter submitted by Drs Vereckei and Miller.1 1. Our study compared the ability of five electrocardiographic methods to differentiate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from other broad QRS tachycardias. We used the methodologies described in the original five publications, and a uniform definition of VT/non-VT (SVT). We made it clear that the VT group comprised patients that had only VT.2 2. In the original papers describing the Brugada and Griffith's algorithms and the lead II criterion, pre-excited tachycardias were not grouped with VTs. In those studies, a diagnosis of VT was only deemed correct when …
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
