Abstract
In a series of 135 patients who underwent esophageal and upper stomach surgery, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 20.4 percent. One hundred four patients had either Gastrografin swallow or the methylene blue test to evaluate anastomotic integrity before resumption of oral feeding. Both tests were disappointing in that methylene blue failed to detect any case of leakage and Gastrografin swallow could only detect three cases of subclinical leakage. The high false-negative detection rate of Gastrografin swallow might be related to the inferior radiographic detail provided by this contrast medium. Aspiration of Gastrografin is potentially dangerous and could be fatal. We believe that barium sulfate, which provides better radiographic detail and is not so hazardous when aspirated, should be the contrast medium of choice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
