Liminal Space: A Retrospective Content Analysis of Ethics Consultation for Patients Aged 18–26

Abstract

PurposeTo characterize the primary ethical issue and contextual features of ethics consultation for patients aged 18–26 years based on setting (adult vs. pediatric). MethodsA retrospective review of 965 ethics consultation notes to identify patients aged 18–26 years cared for in the pediatric or adult setting between January 1, 2016–December 31, 2020. We collected demographic information and used conceptual content analysis to identify the primary ethical issue and contextual features for each consult and analyzed these using descriptive statistics. ResultsWe identified 46 consults (30 adult and 16 pediatric) for 40 unique patients (28 adult and 12 pediatric). The median age was 19 years in the pediatric setting and 24 in the adult setting. Fifty-three percent were female, 95% non-Hispanic, 68% White, and 76% were inpatient. The primary ethical issue in the adult setting was Refusal of Recommended Treatment (20%), while the dominant contextual issue was Communication Disputes/Conflicts Between the Staff and Patient (23%). The primary ethical issue for the pediatric setting was Goals of Care (31%) and the dominant contextual feature was concerns for Quality of Life (31%). DiscussionThe primary ethical issues and related contextual features this population experiences differ based on setting. Improved understanding of adolescent and young adult development, especially related to values formation, decision-making, and communication skills training may ameliorate some of these challenges. Referral patterns for this age group overall and particularly for patients on the ends of the spectrum and inpatients raise concerns for ethics consultation use. Further education about ethics services is recommended.