Lille Apathy Rating Scale-Patient Version in Stroke Survivors: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the factorial structure, psychometric properties, and diagnostic accuracy of the Persian version of the Lille Apathy Rating Scale-Patient version (LARS-P) in stroke survivors. ParticipantsThis study comprised 105 stroke survivors and 41 healthy controls. Methods and SettingExploratory factor analysis was used to determine the factors of the LARS-P. The acceptability, reliability, and validity of the LARS-P were also assessed. Agreement between the LARS-P and the Lille Apathy Rating Scale-informed version (LARS-I) was evaluated using the Bland-Altman plot. The diagnostic accuracy of the LARS-P was determined by categorizing stroke survivors into apathetic and nonapathetic groups based on the “diagnostic criteria of apathy.” ResultsThe exploratory factor analysis showed 3 factors (action initiation and social life; novelty and motivation; and emotional and self-awareness), explaining 67.35% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0.85 for between-items and 0.74 for between-subscales. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)2,1 was >0.88 for test-retest and inter-rater reliability. The LARS-P showed moderate to strong correlations with the LARS-I and Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Apathy subscale (r = 0.70–0.82). In addition, the LARS-P had significant moderate correlations with 2 subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (r or ƿ = 0.47–0.63). There was a 96.19% agreement between LARS-P and LARS-I. The identified cutoff point (>17) for LARS-P exhibited 77.14% sensitivity and 90% specificity in diagnosing apathetic and nonapathetic stroke survivors. Conclusions and ImplicationsThe LARS-P exhibits acceptable psychometric properties in stroke survivors, presenting a promising instrument for assessing apathy through a multidimensional framework.