Abstract

We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, tilde{chi }^0_{1}, may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both with similar likelihoods. The upper limit on the DM density from Planck and other experiments enforces m_{tilde{chi }^0_{1}} lesssim 3 ,, mathrm {TeV} after the inclusion of Sommerfeld enhancement in its annihilations. If most of the cold DM density is provided by the tilde{chi }^0_{1}, the measured value of the Higgs mass favours a limited range of tan beta sim 5 (and also for tan beta sim 45 if mu > 0) but the scalar mass m_0 is poorly constrained. In the wino-LSP case, m_{3/2} is constrained to about 900,, mathrm {TeV} and m_{tilde{chi }^0_{1}} to 2.9pm 0.1,, mathrm {TeV}, whereas in the Higgsino-LSP case m_{3/2} has just a lower limit gtrsim 650,, mathrm {TeV} (gtrsim 480,, mathrm {TeV}) and m_{tilde{chi }^0_{1}} is constrained to 1.12 ~(1.13) pm 0.02,, mathrm {TeV} in the mu >0 (mu <0) scenario. In neither case can the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, (g-2)_mu , be improved significantly relative to its Standard Model (SM) value, nor do flavour measurements constrain the model significantly, and there are poor prospects for discovering supersymmetric particles at the LHC, though there are some prospects for direct DM detection. On the other hand, if the tilde{chi }^0_{1} contributes only a fraction of the cold DM density, future LHC -based searches for gluinos, squarks and heavier chargino and neutralino states as well as disappearing track searches in the wino-like LSP region will be relevant, and interference effects enable mathrm{BR}(B_{s, d} rightarrow mu ^+mu ^-) to agree with the data better than in the SM in the case of wino-like DM with mu > 0.

Highlights

  • SU(5) GUT boundary conditions on soft supersymmetrybreaking parameters [48]. These analyses took into account the strengthening direct constraints from sparticle searches at the LHC, as well as indirect constraints based on electroweak precision observables (EWPOs), flavour observables and the contribution to the density of cold dark matter (CDM) in the Universe from the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), assuming that it is a neutralino and that R-parity is conserved [49,50]

  • We see that in the case of a wino-like LSP, the regions favoured at the 2-σ level are bands with 900 TeV m3/2 1000 TeV corresponding to the envelope of the nearhorizontal band in the right panel of Fig. 2 and in Fig. 3 that is obtained when profiling over tan β

  • We have included the constraint imposed by the cosmological cold dark matter density, which we interpret as either a measurement or an upper limit on the relic LSP density, and searches for dark matter scattering

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In previous papers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] (For more information and updates, please see http://cern.ch/mastercode/.) we have presented likelihood analyses of the parameter spaces of various scenarios for supersymmetry (SUSY) breaking, including the CMSSM [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], in which soft SUSY breaking parameters are constrained to be universal at the grand unification scale, models in which Higgs masses are allowed to be nonuniversal (NUHM1,2) [26,27,28,29,30,31,32], a model in which 10 soft 268 Page 2 of 28Eur. SU(5) GUT boundary conditions on soft supersymmetrybreaking parameters [48]. These analyses took into account the strengthening direct constraints from sparticle searches at the LHC, as well as indirect constraints based on electroweak precision observables (EWPOs), flavour observables and the contribution to the density of cold dark matter (CDM) in the Universe from the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), assuming that it is a neutralino and that R-parity is conserved [49,50]. We analysed the prospects within these scenarios for discovering SUSY at the LHC and/or in future direct dark matter searches [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call