Abstract

The characterization of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the second and third observing runs has increased the sensitivity of the instruments, allowing for a higher number of detectable gravitational-wave signals, and provided confirmation of all observed gravitational-wave events. In this work, we present the methods used to characterize the LIGO detectors and curate the publicly available datasets, including the LIGO strain data and data quality products. We describe the essential role of these datasets in LIGO–Virgo Collaboration analyses of gravitational-waves from both transient and persistent sources and include details on the provenance of these datasets in order to support analyses of LIGO data by the broader community. Finally, we explain anticipated changes in the role of detector characterization and current efforts to prepare for the high rate of gravitational-wave alerts and events in future observing runs.

Highlights

  • The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) [1] and Virgo [2] are the most sensitive facilities for the direct detection of gravitational-waves (GWs)

  • We report the results of detector characterization methods applied to LIGO detector data from O2 and O3 to improve the performance of the detectors and astrophysical analyses

  • There is a marked improvement in the stability of the LIGO detectors between O2 and O3, with coincident science quality time increasing by some 16%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) [1] and Virgo [2] are the most sensitive facilities for the direct detection of gravitational-waves (GWs). In order to address these features of the data that differ from the output of an idealized gravitational-wave interferometer, the LIGO detectors and data are closely monitored before and during observing runs using a large number of additional data streams (referred to as auxiliary channels), that include sensors of the environment surrounding the detectors and measurements of the detector control systems. These efforts to understand and mitigate these sources of noise, both in the instrument and the data are collectively referred to as “detector characterization”.

The O2 and O3 data sets
Computing and Software
Signal processing tools
Web-based services
Instrumental Investigations
Instrumental Investigation methods
Known classes of instrumental noise
Data quality for transient GW analyses
Low Latency Data Quality
Data Quality Products
Gating for transient searches
Unvetoed noise sources
Validation Procedures
15 Auxiliary Channel Data
Data quality for persistent GW searches
Self-gated GW strain for glitch impact mitigation
New or newly identified non-astrophysical spectral artifacts
Other non-astrophysical artifacts
Investigations of coherent noise
Findings
Future prospects
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.