Abstract

No objective technique exists to distinguish necrotic from viable tissue, risking over-excision in burns and loss of wound healing potential. Second window indocyanine green (SWIG) is a novel fluorescence-imaging modality being studied to identify residual solid tumors during oncological surgery. SWIG has also been shown to have avidity for necrosis in animal models, but translation of these findings to humans is lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate SWIG in the identification of burn wound necrosis and compare it with previously published indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) techniques. This study used mouse, human skin xenograft and human patient burn models. Brightfield and SWIG near-infrared imaging were performed on macroscopic tissue samples, which were then cryopreserved, sectioned, and analyzed for microscopic fluorescence. SWIG fluorescence findings were correlated to visual assessment of the burn wound as well as histological markers of necrosis using hematoxylin and eosin and lactate dehydrogenase stains. We found that SWIG identified burn necrosis in a manner dependent on the dose and timing of indocyanine green (ICG) administration and had an inverse fluorescence signal compared with ICGA. Furthermore, SWIG fluorescence identified the interface of viable and nonviable tissue. Our study confirmed that ICGA is an inconsistent and nonstandardized modality to evaluate burn injuries. In contrast, SWIG imaging is a potential imaging modality to objectively prognosticate burn wound healing potential and guide intraoperative burn excision. Further studies are needed to define ratios of fluorescence intensity values to guide surgical decision-making in burn excision and to better define how ICG is retained in necrotic tissue to enhance utility of SWIG in other disease processes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call