Abstract

Two models were calibrated to the 1978 primary productivity conditions of nutrient‐rich hypereutrophic Onondaga Lake, N.Y.; one was based on the approach of Bannister, the other on a more conventional format. The data base, necessary for model development, included continuously monitored incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and 115 parallel measurements of water column temperature, PAR attenuation, chlorophyll a, primary productivity, and key nutrients. Values of key parameters for the Bannister model, obtained by evaluation of the data set, differed from those recommended in the literature. Both models effectively predicted seasonal and shortterm trends in primary productivity for most of the study, though the Bannister model was slightly better. The Bannister model predictions were particularly sensitive to estimates of the maximum quantum yield of photosynthesis. The Bannister model is preferred on theoretical grounds, since it incorporates more fundamental and more constant parameters, ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.