Abstract

Migratory bird species have smaller brains than non-migratory species. The behavioural flexibility/migratory precursor hypothesis suggests that sedentary birds have larger brains to allow the behavioural flexibility required in a seasonally variable habitat. The energy trade-off hypothesis proposes that brains are heavy, energetically expensive and therefore, incompatible with migration. Here, we compared relative brain, neocortex and hippocampus volume between migratory and sedentary bats at the species-level and using phylogenetically independent contrasts. We found that migratory bats had relatively smaller brains and neocortices than sedentary species. Our results support the energy trade-off hypothesis because bats do not exhibit the same degree of flexibility in diet selection as sedentary birds. Our results also suggest that bat brain size differences are subtler than those found in birds, perhaps owing to bats' shorter migration distances. Conversely, we found no difference in relative hippocampus volume between migratory and sedentary species, underscoring our limited understanding of the role of the hippocampus in bats.

Highlights

  • Several studies have examined avian brain size in relation to migratory behaviour at the species [1,2,3] and sub-species level [4,5]

  • At the SL and for phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), relative brain size was significantly greater in sedentary species than in migratory species (SL: t 1⁄4 2.26, p 1⁄4 0.027; PICs: F1,16 1⁄4 7.27, p 1⁄4 0.016; figure 2)

  • At both levels of analysis, relative neocortex size was significantly greater in sedentary species (SL: t 1⁄4 2.94, p, 0.006; PICs: F1,14 1⁄4 4.6, p 1⁄4 0.049; figure 2)

Read more

Summary

Evolutionary biology

Light enough to travel: migratory bats have smaller brains, but not larger hippocampi, than sedentary species. The behavioural flexibility/migratory precursor hypothesis suggests that sedentary birds have larger brains to allow the behavioural flexibility required in a seasonally variable habitat. The energy trade-off hypothesis proposes that brains are heavy, energetically expensive and incompatible with migration. We compared relative brain, neocortex and hippocampus volume between migratory and sedentary bats at the species-level and using phylogenetically independent contrasts. We found that migratory bats had relatively smaller brains and neocortices than sedentary species. Our results support the energy trade-off hypothesis because bats do not exhibit the same degree of flexibility in diet selection as sedentary birds. Our results suggest that bat brain size differences are subtler than those found in birds, perhaps owing to bats’ shorter migration distances. We found no difference in relative hippocampus volume between migratory and sedentary species, underscoring our limited understanding of the role of the hippocampus in bats

INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Mops condylurus
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call