Abstract

The present study was evaluated the effect of different light activation and thermocycling methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) and on the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of metal brackets bonded to feldspathic ceramic. Hundred metal brackets were bonded to 20 porcelain cylinders, divided into four groups (n=25) based on light activation and thermocycling processes. The cylinders were etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s and coated with two layers of silane. The brackets were bonded with Transbond XT composite resin. Light activation in Groups 1 and 3 was performed during 3 s using the VALO Ortho Cordless appliance with irradiance 3,200 mW/cm2 and in Groups 2 and 4 for 40 s using Optilight Max appliance with irradiance 1,200 mW/cm². The samples were stored in deionized water at 37°C for 24 h and the samples from Groups 1 and 2 were submitted to the SBS test at a rate of 1 mm/min, whereas the samples from Groups 3 and 4 were submitted to 7,000 thermal cycles (5°/55°C) before to the SBS test. The data were assessed by two-way analysis of variance and by Tukey's test (a=0.05). No significant difference was observed between SBS means in the different light activation devices used. The samples subjected to thermocycling revealed lower SBS values (p≤0.05). There was predominance of score 0 for ARI in all groups. Therefore, the different light activation methods did not interfere in SBS, but thermocycling reduced SBS.

Highlights

  • There has been a growing demand for orthodontic treatment from adult patients [1,2,3]

  • Shear bond strength values were significantly lower for samples subjected to thermocycling (p

  • Successful bonding of metal brackets to porcelain surfaces and their durability are influenced by several factors, such as preparation of porcelain surfaces, quality of bonding agents, photopolymerization process, and fatigue of bonding agents simulated by means of thermocycling [3,4,5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been a growing demand for orthodontic treatment from adult patients [1,2,3]. Quite often, these patients already have porcelain prostheses and they would not like to have them replaced. These patients already have porcelain prostheses and they would not like to have them replaced This attitude urges orthodontists to find bonding alternatives that are effective and harmless to the porcelain [1,3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call