Abstract

Low density lipoproteins (LDL) are large (Mr = 2.5 x 10(6)) in comparison to LDL receptors (Mr = 115,000). Since most LDL receptors are clustered in coated pits, we tested the hypothesis that crowding of receptor-bound LDL particles would cause steric effects. The apparent affinity of LDL for receptors on cultured fibroblasts decreased near saturation causing concave-upward Scatchard plots. Both the higher and lower affinity components of binding were up-regulated by the cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, lovastatin, indicating that the entire binding curve was sterol-responsive. In contrast, neither component of LDL binding was present on lovastatin-treated or untreated null fibroblasts which are incapable of expressing LDL receptors. Therefore, the concave-upward Scatchard plots were entirely due to binding to LDL receptors. These results are consistent with a lattice model in which receptor-bound LDL are large enough to decrease binding to adjacent receptors. A lattice model implies that large LDL should produce steric effects at a lower receptor occupancy than should small LDL. This was tested using seven LDL fractions that differed in diameter from 20 to 27 nm. Fewer large than small LDL were bound to the cell surface at 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C, and fewer were internalized and degraded at 37 degrees C. Since large LDL bound via both apolipoprotein (apo) E and apoB100, receptor cross-linking could have caused fewer large LDL to be bound at saturation. However, when the potential for cross-linking was prevented by an apo-E-specific monoclonal antibody (1D7), the difference in binding by large versus small LDL was not eliminated; instead, it was exaggerated. Taken together, these results support a lattice model for LDL binding and indicate that steric hindrance associated with crowding of LDL particles on receptor lattices is a major determinant for catabolism by the LDL receptor pathway in vitro.

Highlights

  • Low density lipoproteins (LDL) are large (Mr= 2.5 malian cells.Binding of LDL to LDL X 10’) in comparison to LDL receptors (Mr= 115,000). receptors poses special problems due to the large differences

  • This was present on lovastatin-treated or untreated null suggests that binding of additional LDL particles near satufibroblasts which are incapable of expressing LDL ration might be sterically hindered

  • Fibroblasts were grown to confluency in 35-mm plastic wells as previously described, and LDL receptors were up-regulated by incubation with cholesteroldepleted media for 48 h prior tothe binding assays (23)

Read more

Summary

A LATTICE MODEL FOR LDL BINDING*

Fewer large than small LDL would be bound, internalized, and degraded by cells.This was tested in cultured fibroblasts by studying the surface binding and recep-. EXPERIMENTALPROCEDURES associated with crowdingof LDL particles on receptor Human Subjects-Lipoproteins from nine normolipidemic human lattices is a major determinant for catabolism by the subjects were studied. Their ages ranged from 26 to 51 years; six were. Fibroblasts were grown to confluency in 35-mm plastic wells as previously described, and LDL receptors were up-regulated by incubation with cholesteroldepleted media (containing 10% lipoprotein-deficient serum) for 48 h prior tothe binding assays (23).

RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Of0 92f1 3
BOUND TO SURFACE w
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call