Abstract

It is well known that flagellated bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, sense chemicals in their environment by a chemoreceptor and relay the signals via a well-characterized signaling pathway to the flagellar motor. It is widely accepted that the signals change the rotation bias of the motor without influencing the motor speed. Here, we present results to the contrary and show that the bacteria is also capable of modulating motor speed on merely sensing a ligand. Step changes in concentration of non-metabolizable ligand cause temporary recruitment of stator units leading to a momentary increase in motor speeds. For metabolizable ligand, the combined effect of sensing and metabolism leads to higher motor speeds for longer durations. Experiments performed with mutant strains delineate the role of metabolism and sensing in the modulation of motor speed and show how speed changes along with changes in bias can significantly enhance response to changes in its environment.

Highlights

  • It is well known that bacteria can execute a net directed migration in response to external chemical cues, a phenomenon termed as chemotaxis [1, 2]

  • It is well known that Escherichia coli modulates its motor bias in response to ligands [1]

  • In case of glucose, which is sensed via the Trg chemoreceptor, sensing leads to the dephosphorylation of CheY-P which in turn reduces the motor reversals leading to smooth runs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is well known that bacteria can execute a net directed migration in response to external chemical cues, a phenomenon termed as chemotaxis [1, 2]. When all flagella rotate in the counterclockwise (CCW) direction (as seen from the flagellar end), the flagella collect into a single bundle leading to a forward motion called a run, whereas when one or more of the flagella rotate in the clockwise (CW) direction, they separate from the bundle leading to an abrupt change in direction, known as a tumble [8]. By modulating the duration of runs and tumbles, the bacteria achieve a net motion toward chemoattractants or away from chemorepellents [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.