Abstract

Mining industries have left countless opencast and underground mines in Northwest China without careful disposal for the past decades. The authorities encourage rehabilitation of abandoned mines under the green development strategy, while the path for relevant enterprises remains unclear so far. This paper thus studies the risk distribution of energy alternatives for abandoned mine upgrading. 5 types of upgrading alternatives are studied, including both generation and storage ones. A lifecycle risk system for the alternatives is established for the first time. 12 risk factors extracted through literature and expert involvement are classified as decision-making, implementation, and operation stages. Then, subjective judgements are converted into hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. And the best worst method combined with the interpretive structure model is firstly introduced to calculate relative importance based on mutual influence. Results indicate that photovoltaic and heat storage stations are generally the safest alternatives, with the lowest risk level ranging from 0.7166 to 0.8073 and hesitant degree from 0.3473 to 0.4248. Moreover, risk response measures for each alternative and policy implications for local governments are first raised to put forward AMUEP development. The analytical framework could also be applied elsewhere for smooth rehabilitation of abandoned mines.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.