Abstract

ContextDespite being one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the U.S., there exists a gap in how treatment preferences among Chinese Americans are expressed and enacted upon in inpatient settings. ObjectivesTo compare the rates of advance care documentation and life-sustaining treatment between Chinese American and White American ICU decedents. MethodsIn this matched retrospective decedent cohort study, we included four ICUs within a tertiary medical center located in a Chinatown neighborhood. The Chinese American cohort included adult patients during the terminal admission in the ICU with primary language identified as Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese). The White American cohort was matched according to age, sex, year of death, and admitting diagnosis. ResultsWe identified 154 decedents in each cohort. Despite similar odds on admission, Chinese American decedents had higher odds of DNR completion (OR 1.82; 95%CI 0.99–3.40) and DNI completion (OR 1.81; 95%CI, 1.07–1.57) during the terminal ICU admission. Although Chinese American decedents had similar odds of intubation (aOR 0.90; 95%CI, 0.55–1.48), a higher proportion signed a DNI after intubation (41% vs 25%). Chinese American decedents also had higher odds of CPR (aOR 2.03; 95%CI, 1.03–41.6) with three Chinese American decedents receiving CPR despite a signed DNR order (12% vs 0%). ConclusionsDuring terminal ICU admissions, Chinese American decedents were more likely to complete advance care documentation and to receive CPR than White American decedents. Changes in code status were more common for Chinese Americans after intubation. Further research is needed to understand these differences and identify opportunities for goal-concordant care.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.