Abstract

This paper provides evidence of the importance and necessity of students moral education. The authors show that moral education should be based on the idea that is born in inter-transitions of thought (subjective) and conceivable (objective). It is revealed that the idea points to a lack of life, consisting in the fact that the notions of good, boon, humanity dont correspond in a true way to the reality in which a person lives and thinks about life. The authors show that all the previous development of ethical and pedagogical thinking contains the proof of the idea of good. The authors reveal that the idea as a system-forming link of the transition from values for oneself to the value for another is the pinnacle in the hierarchy of norms. The paper contains an idea of students moral education - life on the basis of morality golden rule which as value it is a link of the transition from values for oneself to the value for another, as the norm it normalizes mutual relations and human interactions with the world and people. The authors also show the difference between value and norm: value is an internal regulator of activity and behavior, norm is an external regulator. The authors reveal that the realization of morality golden rule, which contains the required, proper and prescriptive, by the teacher contributes to the ordering of the meanings of life that become its reference points and to the normalization of student interaction with the world and with people. The authors show that in the process of interaction in the context of morality golden rule, a teacher, provoking counter activity of the student in mastering his/her values, stimulates their implementation by the schoolchild in such a way that other people as well as himself/herself are guided by morality golden rule.

Highlights

  • Бездухов Владимир Петрович, доктор педагогических наук, профессор, член-корреспондент РАО, профессор кафедры педагогики и психологии Позднякова Оксана Константиновна, доктор педагогических наук, профессор, член-корреспондент РАО, профессор кафедры педагогики и психологии Самарский государственный социально-педагогический университет

  • Differences in the pedagogical orientation of European and Russian philosophical schools and traditions are described, when in the European experience «tops» acted as «learners», and in Russia philosophizing as a pedagogical technology in the XIX – early XX centuries was oriented to «bottoms», but in any case it was always practical

  • The assumption is made that in both cases the limitation of the educational audience is unnecessary, which is especially evident in the current conditions of the accessibility of education, from which quite often free philosophizing is emasculated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Бездухов Владимир Петрович, доктор педагогических наук, профессор, член-корреспондент РАО, профессор кафедры педагогики и психологии Позднякова Оксана Константиновна, доктор педагогических наук, профессор, член-корреспондент РАО, профессор кафедры педагогики и психологии Самарский государственный социально-педагогический университет ЖИЗНЬ НА ОСНОВЕ ЗОЛОТОГО ПРАВИЛА НРАВСТВЕННОСТИ КАК ИДЕЯ НРАВСТВЕННОГО ВОСПИТАНИЯ УЧАЩИХСЯ

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.