Abstract
Compulsory treatment in psychiatry is controversial and its use has been increasingly critiqued following the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2006. This essay seeks to explore whether the restriction of personal liberty and autonomy that compulsory treatment requires can be justified on ethical or medical grounds. Compulsory treatment is not without potential harms to the doctor-patient therapeutic relationship and patient engagement with mental health services. However, we contend that the clinical and societal benefits of compulsory treatment justify its practice and that, paradoxically, compulsory treatment is necessary for the restoration of a patient's autonomy rather than its dispossession.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
