Abstract
The detention of irregular migrants in the European Union has increasedin scope and intensity in the years following the 2016 ‘refugee crisis’.Detention is usually codified as an administrative practice, a neutral routinenecessary for the surveillance of irregular migrants and the enforcementof immigration laws. However, this formally ‘administrative’ process beliesa unique contradiction: although cast as a benign procedure, detention isoften experienced by detainees as a form of punishment and incarcerationin the absence of criminal charges. Drawing upon ethnographic fieldwork from the Metsa Detention Centre in Estonia, I argue that this paradox—what I term punitive protection—can make detention a disorienting and uncanny institution for migrants. Detainees experience ‘punitive protection’ as the tension between what they are told is real and what they are certain is real. For my informants, Metsa was not just a space of confinement, but an alternate reality where their beliefs, hopes, and struggles were denied by state practice. Keywords: Migration, detention, agency, refugee studies, criminology
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
