Abstract

Research on male animals suggests that the hormone testosterone plays a central role in mediating the trade-off between mating effort and parental effort. However, the direct links between testosterone, intrasexual aggression and parental care are remarkably mixed across species. Previous attempts to reconcile these patterns suggest that selection favors behavioral insensitivity to testosterone when paternal care is essential to reproductive success and when breeding seasons are especially short. Females also secrete testosterone, though the degree to which similar testosterone-mediated trade-offs occur in females is much less clear. Here, I ask whether testosterone mediates trade-offs between aggression and incubation in females, and whether patterns of female sensitivity to testosterone relate to female life history, as is often the case in males. I experimentally elevated testosterone in free-living, incubating female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), a songbird with a short breeding season during which female incubation and intrasexual aggression are both essential to female reproductive success. Testosterone-treated females showed significantly elevated aggression, reduced incubation temperatures, and reduced hatching success, relative to controls. Thus, prolonged testosterone elevation during incubation was detrimental to reproductive success, but females nonetheless showed behavioral sensitivity to testosterone. These findings suggest that the relative importance of both mating effort and parental effort may be central to understanding patterns of behavioral sensitivity in both sexes.

Highlights

  • Among the most widespread behavioral trade-offs are those between mating effort and parental effort, where individuals divide limited resources between attracting mates or repelling rivals on the one hand, and caring for offspring on the other [1,2,3]

  • Or experimentally elevated testosterone is often associated with greater investment in mating effort via ornaments, armaments, or aggressive behavior, whereas lower androgens are often associated with greater investment in parental care [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]

  • The nests of experimental females were significantly cooler than controls, and this treatment effect was significant despite a significant effect of ambient temperature on nest temperature (GLM: x2 2,18 = 34.4, p,0.0001, ambient temperature: x2 = 12.0, p = 0.0005, treatment: x2 = 31.5, p,0.0001; Figure 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among the most widespread behavioral trade-offs are those between mating effort and parental effort, where individuals divide limited resources between attracting mates or repelling rivals on the one hand, and caring for offspring on the other [1,2,3]. The ‘short season’ hypothesis posits that behavioral insensitivity to T should evolve when breeding seasons are especially short (e.g. in single brooded or arctic dwelling species) because selection ought to favor a rapid transition from mate attraction to parental care [27,30,33,34,35] Each of these hypotheses attempts to explain cases of behavioral insensitivity to T, with the assumption that sensitivity to T should be favored when Tmediated mating effort (e.g. intrasexual aggression, mate guarding, etc.) is important for reproductive success [4,10,27,36] because T may enhance the ability to obtain a mate or keep away rivals When components of mating effort and parental effort overlap in time, with the prediction that one or another behavior might evolve behavioral insensitivity to T

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call