Abstract

AbstractThis study addresses the general hypothesis that insects living in seasonal environments should shorten development times at progressively later dates in the growth season, and that insects living outside equatorial areas should use daylength as a cue to determine the date. Diapause strategies and reaction norms relating the duration of larval development to daylength was investigated in a French population of the butterfly, Lasiommata petropolitana. The results are compared with those of an earlier study of the species in Sweden. Because of the diapausing strategy and phenology of the population, it was expected that an adaptive reaction norm relating larval time to daylength should have a positive slope, i.e. relatively shorter daylengths induce faster growth and development. This prediction was supported, and the reaction norm was qualitatively similar to the one found in Swedish populations. In the French population it was, however, shifted to a range of shorter photoperiods which corresponds to the regime of shorter daylengths in southern Europe. Shorter larval development times and high growth rates were associated with a reduction in pupal size, suggesting a trade off between time and size at pupation. There was no evidence of a trade off between growth rate and starvation endurance. The results suggests that the daylength‐dependent decision of what growth trajectory an individual larva will follow, is not made continuously but rather at one or a few occasions during larval development.It is clear that larvae of L. petropolitana make developmental decisions in relation to the daylength they experience during larval growth. The result is a reaction norm that agrees closely to what is predicted by some life history models, suggesting that it is an adaptation for optimising life history traits in a seasonal environment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call