Abstract

Abstract Backgrounds Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) is a major concern regarding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in low-risk patients. Aims To assess incidence, determinants, modes, and outcome of early to mid-term BVD after TAVI in relation with life expectancy. Methods Consecutive TAVI recipients (2007–2020) with a post-interventional follow-up ≥1-year were prospectively included. BVD components and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) were assessed according to updated Valve-Academic-Research-Consortium-3 criteria. Echocardiographic and laboratory follow-up was performed prior to discharge, at 3- and 12-months, and yearly thereafter. BVD/BVF and all-cause death served as endpoints. Average life expectancy was calculated from National Open Health Data and patients were stratified according to tertiles (1st: <6.85y, 2nd: 6.85–9.7y, 3rd: >9.7y). Results Of 1047 patients (81.6±6.8 y/o, 52.7% female, EuroSCORE II 4.5±2.5), ≥2 follow-ups were available from 622 (serial echo cohort). After a median echo follow-up of 12.2 months, incidence rates of BVD and BVF were 8.4% [95% confidence interval 6.7–10.3], and 3.5% [2.5–4.9] per valve-year, respectively, without differences between life expectancy tertiles (Figure 1). BVD incidence was double within the first year of implant (9.9% [7.7–12.6] per valve-year; mostly non-structural VD) vs. beyond (4.8% [3.1–7.2] per valve-year; structural and non-structural VD). Valve-in-valve procedure, and stenosis severity (both p<0.05), but not age/life expectancy (p>0.5) predisposed for BVD. After 4.4±3.0 years, mortality was 36.7%. Time-dependent BVD/BVF were independently associated with outcome for patients in the first (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.72 [1.06–2.88]/ 2.97 [1.72–6.22]) and second (AHR 1.96 [1.02–3.73]/ 2.31 [1.00–5.30]), but not the third tertile of life expectancy (AHR 1.42 [0.66–3.12]/ 1.84 [0.71–4.79]; Figure 1). Conclusions In this large prospective observational cohort, early to mid-term BVD after TAVI occurred at the same rate across the spectrum of life expectancy and was not prognostic among those with the longest life expectancy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call