Abstract

Replacing virgin fossil resource use in plastic production with renewable feedstock is largely seen as a feasible solution to avoid the extraction of fossil resources and thus combat climate change and depletion of finite natural resources. This study assesses the climate change impacts and fossil energy resource depletion potential of producing renewable intermediate products, namely renewable liquid hydrocarbons, renewable propylene, and renewable polypropylene that can replace fossil alternatives in plastics production. These products were fully derived from bio-based waste and residue raw materials: used cooking oil, waste and residues from vegetable oil processing, animal fat, and fish fat. All three studied renewable products had lower impacts on climate change and fossil energy resource depletion than their fossil-based alternatives. The partial carbon footprint of renewable polypropylene was −2.24 kg CO2-eq. and 0.90 kg CO2-eq. when including and excluding biogenic carbon, respectively. Renewable polypropylene had at least 81% lower carbon footprint and at least 78% lower consumption of fossil fuels when compared to fossil-based polypropylene over their entire life cycle. The benefits of renewable intermediate products, compared to their fossil-based alternatives, were also supported by the sensitivity analysis of the allocation method to the used raw materials.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.