Life cycle assessment of post-combustion carbon capture and storage for the ultra-supercritical pulverized coal power plant

Abstract

In this paper, different emerging post-combustion technologies, i.e., monoethanolamine (MEA), aqueous ammonia, pressure swing adsorption (PSA), temperature swing adsorption (TSA), membrane and calcium looping, were applied to an ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant for carbon capture. A ‘cradle-to-grave’ life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the technical performance and environmental impacts of the power plant with six emerging carbon capture technologies. Carbon capture significantly influences the impact categories directly associated with flue gas emission. The application of carbon capture reduced the GWP in the range of 49–75 %. TAP also reduced in the range of 18–51 %. However, the human toxicity potential, eutrophication potential, ecotoxicity potential and particulate matter formation potential increased due to energy and resource consumption in the upstream and downstream processes. For the life cycle water consumption potential, it decreased by 8 % with calcium looping, whereas it increased in the range of 36–75 % with other post-combustion technologies. The highest reduction in GWP and the least reduction in power efficiency was observed in calcium looping because of the high-temperature heat recovery from flue gas and elimination of complex solvent manufacturing. The plant with aqueous ammonia and membrane separation had the second and third highest reductions in GWP. In addition, the lowest values for TAP, FEP, and MEP were obtained in the membrane system. With MEA for CO2 capture, the total GWP value of the plant is slightly higher than these three technologies mentioned above, and the highest HTPc, FETP, and METP can be observed in this case. TSA and PSA have the most significant environmental impacts in most categories due to higher energy requirements.