Abstract
To support the data requirements of stakeholders, the Nickel Institute (NI) conducted a global life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to show, with indicators, the potential environmental impacts of the production of nickel and ferronickel from mine to refinery gate. A metal industry wide agreed approach on by-products and allocation was applied. Nine companies, comprising 19 operations, contributed data, representing 52 % of global nickel metal production and 40 % of global ferronickel production. All relevant pyro- and hydrometallurgical production routes were considered, across most major nickel-producing regions. Data from Russia, the biggest nickel-producing nation, was included; the Chinese industry did not participate. 2011 was chosen as reference year for data collection. The LCIA applied allocation of impacts of by-products using both economic and mass allocations. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to further understand the relevance and impact of the different allocation approaches. The primary extraction and refining steps are the main contributors to primary energy demand (PED) and global warming potential (GWP), contributing 60 and 70 % to the PED for the production of 1 kg class I nickel and 1 kg nickel in ferronickel, respectively, and over 55 % of the GWP for both nickel products. The PED for 1 kg class 1 nickel was calculated to be 147 MJ, whilst the PED for 1 kg nickel in ferronickel was calculated to be three times higher at 485 MJ. The main factors influencing energy demand in the metallurgical processes are ore grade and ore mineralogy. Sulphidic ore is less energy intensive to process than oxidic ore. Eighty-six percent of the production volume from class 1 nickel producers, in this study, is from sulphidic ore. All ferronickel was produced from oxidic ore. The LCIA results, including a sensitivity analysis of the impact of producers with higher and lower PED, reflect the influence of the production route on energy demand and on environmental impact categories. Conformant to relevant ISO standards, and backed-up with a technical and critical review, this LCIA quantifies the environmental impacts associated with the production of the main nickel products. With this study, a sound background dataset for downstream users of nickel has been provided. The Nickel Institute aims to update their data in the coming years to reflect upon changes in technology, energy efficiency, and raw material input.
Highlights
In view of the ongoing societal debate on energy efficiency and climate change, life cycle assessment data for products and processes play an increasingly important role
Conformant to relevant ISO standards, and backed-up with a technical and critical review, this life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) quantifies the environmental impacts associated with the production of the main nickel products
Through the results of this update study, the member companies of the Nickel Institute have provided high-quality life cycle assessment data covering nickel and ferronickel production from mine to refinery gate, with good market and regional coverage, which identifies the major areas within the production of nickel and ferronickel that contribute to PED and global warming potential (GWP)
Summary
In view of the ongoing societal debate on energy efficiency and climate change, life cycle assessment data for products and processes play an increasingly important role. Due to the physical–chemical properties of nickel, Nicontaining products are known to have the potential to generate higher energy efficiency, to extend a product’s life in service, or to reduce the required maintenance of a product in use compared to other materials. These aspects can lead directly to energy and resource savings, as illustrated in a recent life cycle assessment and life cycle costing study on the world’s longest pier (Mistry et al 2016). Based on the production volumes, the impact on the average results is deemed to be small
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
