Life cycle assessment of different chalcogenide thin-film solar cells

Abstract

Thin-film photovoltaics (PV) cells offer several benefits over conventional first-generation PV technologies, including lighter weight, flexibility, and lower power generation cost. Among the competing thin-film technologies, chalcogenide solar cells offer promising performance on efficiency and technological maturity level. However, in order to appraise the performance of the technology thoroughly, issues such as raw materials scarcity, toxicity, and environmental impacts need to be investigated in detail. This paper therefore, for the first time, presents a cradle to gate life cycle assessment for four different emerging chalcogenide PV cells, and compares their results with copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS) and the commercially available CIGS to examine their effectiveness in reducing the environmental impacts associated with PV technologies. To allow for a full range of indicators, life cycle assessment methods CML 2001, IMPACT 2002+, and ILCD 2011 were used to analyse the results. The results identify environmental hotspots associated with different materials and components and demonstrate that using current efficiencies, the environmental impact of copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) for generating 1kWh electricity was lower than that of the other studied cells. However, at comparable efficiencies the antimony-based cells offered the lowest environmental impacts in all impact categories. The effect of materials used was also found to be lower than the impact of electricity consumed throughout the manufacturing process, with the absorber layer contributing the most to the majority of the impact categories examined. In terms of chemicals consumed, cadmium acetate contributed significantly to the majority of the environmental impacts. Stainless steel in the substrate/insulating layer and molybdenum in the back contact both contributed considerably to the toxicity and ozone depletion impact categories. This paper demonstrates considerable environmental benefits associated with non-toxic chalcogenide PV cells suggesting that the current environmental concerns can be addressed effectively using alternative materials and manufacturing techniques if current efficiencies are improved.