Abstract

Organizations play a key role in reducing anthropogenic pressure on the natural environment. The first step towards improving their sustainability performances is the implementation of methodologies that take into consideration multiple environmental impact categories, as well as the entire value chain. The attention of scholars and practitioners was initially addressed to the analysis of products and processes, yet in a few cases in which they were addressed, the approaches used for organizations had a limited scope and range of use. Only in recent years have they been framed in a life cycle perspective. This article analyzes two recent life cycle-based methodologies that have their focus on the organization, namely Organization Environmental Footprint (OEF) and Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (O-LCA). The goal is to define the state of the art of their methodological and current application developments and consider the relevance that these methodologies can have, both in terms of internal and external commitment (e.g., for the supply chain actors) and of reporting and communication requirements. The research was carried out starting from scientific databases, integrating technical legislation and secondary literature. The results obtained allowed tracing the first evolutionary trends, identifying the main authors and scientific journals and highlighting the relevant issues according to the researchers. A content and bibliometric analysis was performed that included all the contributions published so far. Projects and case studies that practically applied the two methodologies were also identified and analyzed. Finally, the main differences between the two methodologies were highlighted and future developments were hypothesized.

Highlights

  • In 2002, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) was held in Johannesburg, South Africa and encouraged a series of programs that focused on sustainable production and consumption

  • The life cycle perspective and related approaches have progressively established themselves as the most effective in order to capture the totality of the impacts of products, processes, and services, starting from the extraction of raw materials to get to end of life (ISO 2006a, 2006b)

  • Despite the relatively short time frame covered by the research, a significant number of contributions dealing with the study of the two methodologies emerged: 20 scientific articles, 4 technical/official documents (European Commission 2013; ISO 2014; UNEP/SETAC 2015, 2017), and 2 book chapters (Manzardo et al 2016; Martínez-Blanco et al 2016) were identified

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2002, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) was held in Johannesburg, South Africa and encouraged a series of programs that focused on sustainable production and consumption. Great efforts have been made to develop methods, techniques, and tools to evaluate, compare, and communicate the environmental performance of products and services (Martínez-Blanco et al 2016). The life cycle perspective and related approaches have progressively established themselves as the most effective in order to capture the totality of the impacts of products, processes, and services, starting from the extraction of raw materials to get to end of life (ISO 2006a, 2006b). The same attention was not paid to organizations that can play a key role in reducing pressure on the environment. In order to take credible steps in that direction, they need stable.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call