Abstract
This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems ofknowledge production dominated by “AngloAmerican” academia and critically examine the“EastWest” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography shouldlearn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries bothin academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of“Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror tothe various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”,“dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectivelyerase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “nonAngloAmerican” scholars often left“beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographiesof sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges thatscholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, Iattempt to stand for our/their recognition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.