Abstract

This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems ofknowledge production dominated by “Anglo­American” academia and critically examine the“East­West” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography shouldlearn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries bothin academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of“Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror tothe various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”,“dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectivelyerase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “non­AngloAmerican” scholars often left“beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographiesof sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges thatscholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, Iattempt to stand for our/their recognition.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.