Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of lidocaine gel and plain lubricating gel in relieving pain during transrectal sonography (TRS) in patients with gynecologic problems. MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted in 80 participants who were scheduled to undergo TRS. The participants were allocated into the lidocaine gel group and the aqueous gel group at a 1:1 ratio. The intensity of pain during TRS based on the visual analogue scale (0–10 points) and the adverse events were assessed and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe two groups had similar demographic characteristics. Between the lidocaine and aqueous gel groups, there was no significant difference in the pain score at probe manipulation (4.04±2.14 vs. 4.21±2.79; P=0.868), as well as at baseline, probe insertion, and 5min after probe removal. The degree of acceptability of the sonographer also did not differ between the two groups. No acute and delayed adverse events was occurred. ConclusionIntrarectal lidocaine gel for TRS provides no analgesic benefit compared with aqueous gel.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
