Abstract

Contrary to the predictions of traditional life-cycle models, households do not engage in perfect consumption smoothing. Similarly, weak evidence of income hedging runs against standard portfolio theory. We link these two puzzles by proposing a model in which investors derive utility from consumption and income status. In contrast to the traditional life-cycle model, status conscious investors use financial assets to either over- or under-hedge income fluctuations, depending on whether they treat consumption and status as complements or substitutes. We confirm the predictions of the status preference model using data from the PSID, and find that status preferences empirically affect the income hedging motive in household portfolio decisions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.