Abstract

This article argues that Buddhist-Christian dialogue in Korea needs to be socially responsible and engaging because the religious neighbors and suffering neighbors in the country are inseparable. Also, it challenges an assumption that Buddhism in general and Zen in particular are by nature socially disengaging. Korean Zen, like any other religious tradition, has both promises and problems in regard to its response to the reality of social suffering. On the one hand, with its emphases on engaged mindfulness , non-attachment , and bodhisattva compassion , Zen may encourage Buddhists (and non-Buddhists) to transform the self and society. On the other hand, Zen shows its limitations, such as enlightenment essentialism and ethical non-differentiation , which discourage Buddhists from engaging in social action. Thus, this article examines both what is liberating and what needs to be liberated in Korean Zen from the viewpoint of a Christian who practices Zen.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.