Abstract
In Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) research, technology is commonly perceived as an innovative tool to “enhance” the quality of pedagogical experiences. The assumptions that the introduction of new technology has brought about a more effective learning paradigm into current classrooms have rarely been challenged by TEL researchers. In this context, teachers are often considered as important actors who are responsible to achieve the urgent mission of TEL, which is to effectively integrate new technology in classrooms. However, this article argues that such blind faith in TEL can have ramifications in actual educational contexts. It is mainly because this blind faith can determine what is possible or impossible for teachers in enacting their pedagogical beliefs, and thus, in imagining alternative educational scenarios for their students. This paper, therefore aims to reveal how dominant theories in the TEL field, largely drawn from the common assumptions of an educational role of technology, produce a set of imperative claims about teachers and their subjectivity in the field of teacher education. By doing so, this research intends to envision new roles of theory in TEL research, arguing that ‘disruptive theory’ can help us to challenge the common, but uncritical assumptions prevailing in TEL and further open unique opportunities for more critical debates. The first part of the paper will conceptualise theory as discourse and describe a methodological approach utilised in this critical literature review project. The second part will critically review different theories in a set of scholarly journal articles (N=33) concerning TEL-related teacher education, highlighting the dominant, but limited ways in which the theories have guided knowledge construction in those articles. Three themes (i.e., building, medicalising, expanding) have been identified as common actions of theories in TEL research through the authors’ open coding process. The third part will point out the taken-for-granted assumptions in which TEL theories are commonly rooted. It continues to discuss alternative and imaginative ways in which theory can inspire TEL research based on three disruptive roles that a TEL theory may take. The disruptive theories are essential to challenge taken-for-granted assumptions with imaginative thoughts which seem to be dormant in TEL research. They may contribute to liberating teachers from the dominant theories and the unquestioned mission and further empowering them to be able to create their own pedagogical possibilities and ultimately, may contribute to freely educating their students.Keywords: discourse analysis; theory; technology; teacher education; TPACK; FoucaultPart of the Special Issue Debating the status of ‘theory’ in technology enhanced learning research
Highlights
Technology integration in education has been told as one of the most urgent and inevitable tasks to ‘innovate’ the quality of learning and teaching experiences for over a few decades
Given that this paper aims to identify what theory has been doing in Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) research, it seems necessary to devise a conceptual tool which treats theory as an agent so that the actions of theory can be empirically analysed
Even though it has stated that theory does often lurk, distil, and reframe in educational research, the focus of the present study is more on identifying what theory is doing while it is lurking, distilling and reframing in TEL research
Summary
Technology integration in education has been told as one of the most urgent and inevitable tasks to ‘innovate’ the quality of learning and teaching experiences for over a few decades. It is even mentioned that the use of technology in education can no longer be thought of as a choice to be made on the part of teachers, nor can it be considered an add-on to the curriculum or reserved for special occasions in the classroom Discussions among teacher educators and researchers in the field of Technology Enhanced Learning (hereafter, TEL) have been devoted to these urgent calls by proposing new theories, testing them, and developing them. If the theories originate from the same cradle, they are likely to produce a seemingly divergent but essentially homogenous type of effects which might not broaden our perspectives on teacher subjectivity in relation to using technology
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
