Abstract

Incompatible generic and political judgments have divided critical discussion of Richard Wright’s Native Son for 70 years. Far from indicating the novel’s failure to cohere, this essay shows how the contest between naturalist and existential readings of Native Son emerged from the novel allegorizing midcentury liberalism’s equivocal concept of judgment. In its rhetoric of blindness, Native Son anticipates and thematizes antithetical “blind” judgments of Bigger. By treating this structuring rhetorical pattern as evidence of Wright’s critique of liberalism, we might move beyond the novel’s dichotomous reception and consider how Native Son performs the critical function associated with literary modernism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.