Abstract
SummaryBackgroundEradicating food insecurity is necessary for achieving global health goals. Liberal trade policies might increase food supplies but how these policies influence individual-level food insecurity remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the association between liberal trade policies and food insecurity at the individual level, and whether this association varies across country-income and household-income groups.MethodsFor this observational analysis, we combined individual-level data from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN with a country-level trade policy index from the Konjunkturforschungsstelle Swiss Economic Institute. We examined the association between a country's trade policy score and the probability of individuals reporting moderate-severe or severe food insecurity using regression models and algorithmic weighting procedures. We controlled for multiple covariates, including gross domestic product, democratisation level, and population size. Additionally, we examined heterogeneity by country and household income.ResultsOur sample comprised 460 102 individuals in 132 countries for the period of 2014–17. Liberal trade policy was not significantly associated with moderate-severe or severe food insecurity after covariate adjustment. However, among households in high-income countries with incomes higher than US$25 430 per person per year (adjusted for purchasing power parity), a unit increase in the trade policy index (more liberal) corresponded to a 0·07% (95% CI −0·10 to −0·04) reduction in the predicted probability of reporting moderate-severe food insecurity. Among households in the lowest income decile (<$450 per person per year) in low-income countries, a unit increase in the trade policy index was associated with a 0·35% (0·06 to 0·60) increase in the predicted probability of reporting moderate-severe food insecurity.InterpretationThe relationship between liberal trade policy and food insecurity varied across countries and households. Liberal trade policy was predominantly associated with lower food insecurity in high-income countries but corresponded to increased food insecurity among the world's poorest households in low-income countries.FundingJoseph Rowntree Foundation, Economic and Social Research Council.
Highlights
Food insecurity is a root cause of many of today’s most pressing global health challenges and prevents millions of individuals from reaching their full social and economic potential.[1]
Interpretation The relationship between liberal trade policy and food insecurity varied across countries and households
Liberal trade policy was predominantly associated with lower food insecurity in high-income countries but corresponded to increased food insecurity among the world’s poorest households in low-income countries
Summary
Food insecurity is a root cause of many of today’s most pressing global health challenges and prevents millions of individuals from reaching their full social and economic potential.[1] Food insecurity has serious and long lasting effects on health and can result in malnutrition, wasting, and premature mortality.[2,3] Even in contexts where these severe outcomes are rare, food insecurity is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, poor mental health, and poor management of long-term health conditions.[4,5,6,7,8,9] And yet, the world is facing a series of challenges to eradicating food insecurity. The proportion of the global population with chronic food deprivation declined sub stantially in 2005–15, from 14·5% in 2005 to 10·6% in 2015.10 this downward trend has stalled, and the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, population growth, and declining biodiversity might undermine the previous progress.[11]. Eradicating food insecurity is, a key priority in the global health agenda.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
