Abstract

The West is concerned over the crisis of the liberal world order attributing it to the conduct of emerging powers, such as China, India and Russia. Are its concerns legitimate? Drawing on social identity theory, the authors analyze the emerging powers’ stances on international development through the lens of status dynamics. In particular, three issue areas are investigated: the debate over the UN development agenda, which has revealed differences between Western and non-Western approaches, the changes in the membership of donor and recipient groups over the last decade and the discourse of emerging countries concerning science and technology, which betrays their self-image of a “developed” or “laggard” state.The key finding of the paper is that the crisis of the liberal world order as a set of institutions created by the US-led countries after WWII manifests itself in the distorting symbolic exchange between developed and developing countries. The emerging states are unwilling to recognize the authority of the West and its leadership in setting the direction of global development. Meanwhile, they are trying to gain the status of development front-runners using their own foreign aid programs and science and technology development strategies. However, the rising states are not uniform and consistent in posing a symbolic challenge to the liberal order – while the Russia is striving for a “developed non-western country” status (thereby copying the USSR’s image), India and China, though to different degrees, are positioning themselves both as developed industrial states and as developing countries which receive aid packages from richer members of the international community. What leads to the distortions in this symbolic exchange is the desire of some emerging powers to use the resources of the West and reap the benefits of the world order created by it while denying it a high status. Thus, a classic economic “free-rider problem” arises in international relations: while benefiting from the liberal order created by the West, the rising states do not recognize the status it ascribes itself ignoring the symbolic hierarchy which, as viewed by western countries, underlies this order.The authors declare the absence of conflict of interest.

Highlights

  • The West is concerned over the crisis of the liberal world order attributing it to the conduct of emerging powers, such as China, India and Russia

  • The key finding of the paper is that the crisis of the liberal world order as a set of institutions created by the US-led countries after WWII manifests itself in the distorting symbolic exchange between developed and developing countries

  • При определённых условиях Китай и Индия готовы принимать помощь Запада и сотрудничать с западными институтами, включая крупнейшие международные фонды, символизирующие западное доминирование и патернализм (Фонд Билла и Мелинды Гейтс здесь может служить наиболее ярким примером)

Read more

Summary

ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИ

«Безбилетники» либерального порядка: повестка международного развития и символические политики восходящих держав. Запад обеспокоен кризисом либерального глобального порядка и связывает этот кризис с политикой восходящих центров силы: Китая, Индии, России. Опираясь на теорию социальной идентичности, авторы анализируют подходы восходящих держав к вопросам международного развития в категориях статусной динамики. Третий – это научно-технические дискурсы восходящих держав в связи с их самопрезентациями на оси «отсталость – развитость». Наш ключевой вывод состоит в том, что кризис либерального порядка – как системы институтов, созданной Соединёнными Штатами и их союзниками после Второй мировой войны – проявляется в нарушении символического обмена между «развитыми» и «развивающимися» странами. Готовность ряда восходящих держав пользоваться ресурсами Запада и возможностями созданного им международного порядка, одновременно отказывая ему в признании его высокого статуса, и приводит к нарушению символического обмена.

Research Article
Кризис либерального порядка
Статус и символическая политика
Findings
Международное развитие и международная помощь

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.