Abstract

Discussion between defenders of preservation of elements of “liberal education” and those who consider it “remnants” (V. Pareto) of the “outdated” model of the “classical university” unfolds in the horizon of the “liberal consensus” regarding the “values” and “goals” of university education in the globalizing reality presented in the economic paradigm (J. Agamben). The prospect of preserving the liberal democratic tradition and the formation of civic “skills of democracy” translates the discussion into a plan of interpreting the meaning of these values and determining the conditions for ensuring their validity. A philosophical interpretation of the essence of liberal values in the context of the foundations of the economic paradigm, which presupposes external criticism, allows us to assert: the distinction between “free” and “professional” education, which is valid for the “university of reason” and has limited significance for the concept of liberal education, is removed in the modern model of the universitycorporation as an enterprise for the production of human capital and practically oriented knowledge/learning aimed at fulfilling the request market for a specialist who has mastered a variety of competencies. The concept of “sustainable development”, the constitutive of which in recent years has become the discourse of security, determines a specific explanation of “politicization” (W. Beck), one of which is the defense of “free education”, a palliative that corrects the universal and total “monocausal logic of capital” as a real beginning (in the meaning of “ἀρχή”) of global modernity presented in the liberal version of the economic paradigm.

Highlights

  • The discussion between supporters of "free" university education and those who consider the goal of the university to form "competencies" that meet the needs of the globalizing modernity has a long history

  • Schleiermacher and W. von Humboldt, a special case of which is W. von Humboldt's "research university" model, the role played by theology in Newman is attributed to philosophy

  • It is better in this connection to speak not of "completion", but of "foundation." In both cases, the university is considered a "place of knowledge"; if in the German version reason, "preparation for which" is university education, is a principle of reality (Fichte expressed it most radically), in the Newman's concept of "liberal education" emphasis was initially on "preparation for life"

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The discussion between supporters of "free" university education ( called "liberal") and those who consider the goal of the university to form "competencies" that meet the needs of the globalizing modernity has a long history. Placing a modern discussion between defenders of "liberal" university education and supporters of the earliest possible disposal of its still existing "remnants" Jaspers [6]) and the fate of the university as a phenomenon excluded from the present and, at the same time, will allow us to compare the meaning of arguments about the purpose and functions, about the form of a modern university, given by the participants in the ongoing discussion

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call