Abstract
A critical analysis is offered of two ad hominem arguments advanced by Rep. Barney Frank during the House debate on the Defense of Marriage Act. The analysis suggests that applying ad hominem argument concepts to political talk affords the possibility of recovering a place for character (ethos) in such discourse.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
