Abstract

In tropical regions, rainfall gradients often explain the abundance and distribution of plant species. For example, many tree and liana species adapted to seasonal drought are more abundant and diverse in seasonally‐dry forests, characterized by long periods of seasonal water deficit. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) is commonly used to explain plant distributions across climate gradients. However, the relationship between MAP and plant distribution is often weak, raising the question of whether other seasonal precipitation patterns better explain plant distributions in seasonally‐dry forests. In this study, we examine the relationship between liana abundance and multiple metrics of seasonal and annual rainfall distribution to test the hypothesis that liana density and diversity increase with increasing seasonal drought along a rainfall gradient across the isthmus of Panama. We found that a normalized seasonality index, which combines MAP and the variability of monthly rainfall throughout the year, was a significant predictor of both liana density and species richness, whereas MAP, rainfall seasonality and the mean dry season precipitation (MDP) were far weaker predictors. The strong response of lianas to the normalized seasonality index indicates that, in addition to the total annual amount of rainfall, how rainfall is distributed throughout the year is an important determinant of the hydrological conditions that favor liana proliferation. Our findings imply that changes in annual rainfall and rainfall seasonality will determine the future distribution and abundance of lianas. Models that aim to predict future plant diversity, distribution, and abundance may need to move beyond MAP to a more detailed understanding of rainfall variability at sub‐annual timescales.

Highlights

  • A central goal in ecology is to explain the distribution of organisms

  • For Mean annual precipitation (MAP), the much greater amount of wet season precipitation may poorly predict the amount of dry season rainfall, obscuring the amount of water stress that plants experience

  • In the current study, we found that MAP and mean dry season precipitation (MDP) explained less than 18% of the variation in the measures of liana density and richness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rainfall gradients often explain the abundance and distribution of many plant species. Identifying the climate characteristics that best describe the variation in plant abundance provides critical insights into the determinants of plant distribution (Schnitzer 2005, 2018, Condit et al 2013). Mean annual precipitation (MAP) is a common measure to quantify the amount of water stress experienced by plants and, MAP is often used to explain plant distributions (Condit et al 2000, Schnitzer 2005, DeWalt et al 2015). MAP includes the wet season rainfall, which often exceeds the soil water holding capacity, leading to water losses via surface runoff and deep recharge that are unavailable to support plant activity (Feng et al 2012). MAP may fail to adequately describe the duration of time that plants experience seasonal drought, which may have a strong direct effect on plant distribution (Manzané-Pinzón et al 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call