Abstract
The legal implications of pharmacists serving as therapeutic consultants to other health professionals are discussed. The legal view of the consultant relationship and the relative liability exposure of the primary practitioner and the consultant are reviewed. The pharmacist's liability when serving as a therapeutic consultant is considered in light of the high standard of care that would probably be used in evaluating the pharmacist's performance. Other legal issues considered include potential criminal liability of the pharmacist, whether responses should be in writing, impact of charging for therapeutic consultation services, and coverage for such activities under professional liability insurance policies. By being aware of the legal implications in these areas, pharmacists may limit their liability exposure to an acceptable level.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
