Abstract
The article addresses the issue of the liability of the motor vehicle owner (the perpetrator of a road accident) and the third-party motor liability insurer for damages related to the costs of post-accident road cleaning. It is a polemic with the concept of a broad understanding of the scope of liability of the perpetrator and the insurer, presented by the Supreme Court and some legal doctrine, because it contradicts, among others, the statutory catalogue of obligations imposed on (particularly public) road administrators. Moreover, arguments have been advanced for a different interpretation of the terms "property damage" and "destruction" as well as the unjustified enrichment of the road administrator seeking cost refund from the perpetrator or the third-party liability insurer.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
