Abstract
This study examine and to analyze article 16 paragraph (1 ) letter C UUJN, namely of obligation to attact fingerprints to the Minuta Notary deed. As for the problem is the reason the parties mush attach their fingerprints to the Notary deed minutes. This research is a kind of normatif juridical research. The research approach used in descriptive sociological legal research. Type of data used are primary, secondary and tertiery data. Sources of data in this study are primary, secondary, and tertiary data sources. Data completion technique used in literature study and study. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the sticking of the fingerprints does not effect the authenticity of an authentic deed. There is an obligation to attact a special sheet of fingerprints that aim to protect the Notary public from the act of denial of signature that is done by the eater. When at one point the signatory was denied by the taper and was sued in court. Althought the deed without a fingerprints is not accepted, the Notarial deed remains an authentuc deed and is not degraded into a ded under the hand.Based on the deskription, the Notary must carry out his obligation to attacct the fingerprint of the addressee, because it is a form of legal protection for the Notary against the denial of signature by the tappers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.