Abstract
South African law recognises claims against medical practitioners by mothers whose children have been born with congenital defects, the so-called 'wrongful birth actions'. The basis of such claims is that if the medical practitioner had detected and informed the mother of the fetus's congenital defects, she would have terminated the pregnancy and the child would not have been born and suffered from the defects and caused her additional expense. The Supreme Court of Appeal in Stewart v. Botha (340/2007) [2008] ZASCA 84 had to consider whether a child born with congenital defects can himself or herself sue the medical practitioner for allowing the child to be born, the so-called 'wrongful life actions'. The court held that wrongful life actions should not be recognised in our law because the core of such cases is to require the court to decide whether it is preferable, from the child's perspective, not to have been born at all.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.