Abstract

Public legislation has long failed to meet such large-scale challenges as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In emergencies, to protect the lives and health of the population, it is necessary to promptly make decisions on the legal regulation of public relations that have developed due to the spread of Covid-19. For this purpose, the state has created legal mechanisms that are designed to ensure compliance with the rule of law and which need the scientific-legal assessment. The objective of the work is to analyze the novelties of administrative and criminal legislation, which regulate the liability for violation of quarantine. The object of research is the norms of administrative and criminal law. The subject of the study is public relations that have developed as a result of the introduction of quarantine and which are governed by administrative and criminal law. To achieve this goal, the situation in foreign countries was firstly analyzed; general patterns were identified; alternative solutions were proposed, with a minimum restriction of human rights and freedoms. Then, the novelties of the national legislation were studied in more detail; additional specific problems were identified; and a more balanced legislative policy was proposed. As a result of the study, the current state of legal regulation in the areas of administrative and criminal law related to quarantine violations was analyzed; the liability for such offenses was characterized; some conclusions regarding the existing related problems were made and options for their solution were proposed, as well as propositions for modernization of legislation were made.

Highlights

  • Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) sets out the guidelines for criminal liability

  • The formal-legal method was used to formulate the features and properties of legal norms, which they enshrine in law, including articles of the Code on Administrative Offenses and the Criminal Code, which relate to liability for violation of quarantine restrictions

  • Under the influence of the coronavirus pandemic, quarantine restrictions have been reflected in the legal regulation of most countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) sets out the guidelines for criminal liability. The European Convention on Human Rights (1950) establishes several rules that are extremely important for addressing issues related to liability in criminal and administrative matters. According to Art. 6 of the Convention, everyone is guaranteed the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, which will determine the merits of any criminal charge. Article 15 of this international treaty states that in a state of emergency threatening the life of the nation, any signatory State may take measures derogating from its obligations under the Convention, but only to the extent and subject to that, such measures do not conflict with its other international legal obligations (Arakelyan, 2020; Tulyakov, 2020; European Court of Human Rights, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call