Abstract
This paper proposes an analysis on the notion of logical reasons in sound evaluation as a system for evidence valuation in trials. To do so, two models of logic that seems to be suitable for that object are putted forward: factual and non monotonic logics. Before the conclusions are drawn four sentences held by Chilean superior courts in cases that sound evaluation has to be applied are examined in light of those two models of logic.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
