Abstract
This paper is a comparative analysis of the Logica Campsale Anglici, valde utilis et realis contra Ocham, from an anonymous author known as pseudo Richard of Campsall, and Ockham’s Summa logicae, in answer to which the former was written. We summarize both authors’s fundamental positions on five key issues: 1) the synonymy between abstract and concrete terms, 2) the reference of primary and secondary intentions, 3) the nature of the relations of predication between terms in propositions, 4) the status of the “passions of the soul” and 5) the prime signification of spoken words. Our aim is to sketch the polemic between Nominalism and Realism in the second decade of the XIVth century.
Highlights
La respuesta de Ockham, como se ve, es positiva: según él, los conceptos abstractos del mencionado tipo son sinónimos de sus correspondientes concretos, de tal modo que no significan nada distinto que aquéllos, y no difieren de ellos más que en cuanto a la expresión lingüística
This paper is a comparative analysis of the Logica Campsale Anglici, valde utilis et realis contra Ocham, from an anonymous author known as pseudo Richard of Campsall, and Ockham’s Summa logicae, in answer to which the former was written
Our aim is to sketch the polemic between Nominalism and Realism in the second decade of the XIVth century
Summary
La respuesta de Ockham, como se ve, es positiva: según él, los conceptos abstractos del mencionado tipo son sinónimos de sus correspondientes concretos, de tal modo que no significan nada distinto que aquéllos (por lo cual son intercambiables en la misma proposición mental, así como son predicables recíprocamente), y no difieren de ellos más que en cuanto a la expresión lingüística.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.