Leydig cell hyperplasia and adenoma formation: Mechanisms and relevance to humans

Abstract

Leydig cell adenomas are observed frequently in studies evaluating the chronic toxicity of chemical agents in laboratory animals. Doubts have been raised about the relevance of such responses for human risk assessment, but the question of relevance has not been evaluated and presented in a comprehensive manner by a broad group of experts. This article reports the consensus conclusions from a workshop on rodent Leydig cell adenomas and human relevance. Five aspects of Leydig cell biology and toxicology were discussed: 1) control of Leydig cell proliferation; 2) mechanisms of toxicant-induced Leydig cell hyperplasia and tumorigenesis; 3) pathology of Leydig cell adenomas; 4) epidemiology of Leydig cell adenomas; and 5) risk assessment for Leydig cell tumorigens. Important research needs also were identified. Uncertainty exists about the true incidence of Leydig cell adenomas in men, although apparent incidence is rare and restricted primarily to white males. Also, surveillance databases for specific therapeutic agents as well as nicotine and lactose that have induced Leydig cell hyperplasia or adenoma in test species have detected no increased incidence in humans. Because uncertainties exist about the true incidence in humans, induction of Leydig cell adenomas in test species may be of concern under some conditions. Occurrence of Leydig cell hyperplasia alone in test species after lifetime exposure to a chemical does not constitute a cause for concern in a risk assessment for carcinogenic potential, but early occurrence may indicate a need for additional testing. Occurrence of Leydig cell adenomas in test species is of potential concern as both a carcinogenic and reproductive effect if the mode of induction and potential exposures cannot be ruled out as relevant for humans. The workgroup focused on seven hormonal modes of induction of which two, GnRH agonism and dopamine agonism, were considered not relevant to humans. Androgen receptor antagonism, 5α-reductase inhibition, testosterone biosynthesis inhibition, aromatase inhibition, and estrogen agonism were considered to be relevant or potentially relevant, but quantitative differences may exist across species, with rodents being more sensitive. A margin of exposure (MOE; the ratio of the lowest exposure associated with toxicity to the human exposure level) approach should be used for compounds causing Leydig cell adenoma by a hormonal mode that is relevant to humans. For agents that are positive for mutagenicity, the decision regarding a MOE or linear extrapolation approach should be made on a case-by-case basis. In the absence of information about mode of induction, it is necessary to utilize default assumptions, including linear behavior below the observable range. All of the evidence should be weighed in the decision-making process.