Abstract

In qualitative decision theory, a very natural way of defining preference relations ≽ over the policies (acts) is by using the so called Dominance Plausible Rule. To do that, we need a relation > over the consequences and a relation \(\sqsupseteq\) over the events. Very interesting axiomatic characterizations, à la Savage, have been established for these decision relations [6,7]. Namely, when the relation \(\sqsupseteq\) is a possibilistic relation. Unfortunately, this kind of decision relation is not discriminant enough. We have searched for decision rules that discriminate more than those defined through a possibilistic relation. In particular, in this work, we study decision relations defined by the Dominance Plausible Rule using a leximax relation \(\sqsupseteq\). We give an axiomatic characterization of these decision relations.KeywordsPreference RelationLinear OrderDefault RuleComplete RelationDecision RelationThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.