Lexical-semantic knowledge about food in patients with different types of dementia

Abstract

Event Abstract Back to Event Lexical-semantic knowledge about food in patients with different types of dementia Raffaella I. Rumiati1*, Francesco Foroni1, Giulio Pergola1, Paola Rossi2 and Maria C. Silveri2 1 Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Area of Neuroscience, Italy 2 Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Neurology department, Italy While many theories agree that the conceptual knowledge is organized in categories, there is less agreement on the underlying organizational principle (e.g. Warrington & Shallice, 1984, Caramazza & Shelton, 1998; Capitani et al., 2003). Previous neuropsychological studies on semantic categories failed to clearly characterize the status of food as a category as they did not carefully distinguish between natural food and transformed food. Exploring how natural food and transformed food items are processed in patients suffering from primary dementia can allow us to test the theories of how semantic knowledge is organized in the brain. Thirty patients and 15 healthy controls matched for age and education took part in the study . Thirteen patients received a presumptive diagnosis of fronto-temporal dementia (FTD), 3 patients of Semantic Dementia (SD), and 14 of Alzheimer Dementia (AD). All participants performed 3 tasks tapping lexical-semantic knowledge about food and non-food items: confrontation naming (Task 1), categorization (Task 2), and word-to-picture matching (Task 3). Moreover, half food items were natural (e.g., apple) and half transformed (e.g. grana cheese), while non-food items were half non edible natural items (e.g., plant) and half kitchen implements. The results showed that, overall, patients performed poorer than controls on Tasks 1 and 3, with FTD-SD patients being more impaired than AD patients. When we compared performance on food versus non-food items, we observed that patients performed better on naming food than non-food items (Task 1). Specifically, FTD-SD patients displayed a significant difference between food and non-food items, while AD patients showed no difference. On Task 3 the same pattern was obtained. In addition, we observed that, across tasks, transformed food was processed better than natural food. These findings suggest that lexical-semantic processes are more prone to degradation in patients FTD-SD than in AD patients, and that food items, particularly the transformed ones, are more resistant to the deficit. Results are interpreted in the light of current theories of conceptual knowledge (Mahon & Caramazza, 2009). References Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003) What are the facts of semantic-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261. Caramazza, A. & Shelton, J. R. (1998) Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27-51. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984) Category-Specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-885. Keywords: Food, lexical semantics, conceptual knowledge, Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal Dementia Conference: Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, United States, 5 Oct - 7 Oct, 2014. Presentation Type: Poster presentation ONLY Topic: Not student Citation: Rumiati RI, Foroni F, Pergola G, Rossi P and Silveri MC (2014). Lexical-semantic knowledge about food in patients with different types of dementia. Front. Psychol. Conference Abstract: Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2014.64.00091 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 30 Apr 2014; Published Online: 04 Aug 2014. * Correspondence: Prof. Raffaella I Rumiati, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Area of Neuroscience, Trieste, 34136, Italy, rumiati@sissa.it Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Raffaella I Rumiati Francesco Foroni Giulio Pergola Paola Rossi Maria C Silveri Google Raffaella I Rumiati Francesco Foroni Giulio Pergola Paola Rossi Maria C Silveri Google Scholar Raffaella I Rumiati Francesco Foroni Giulio Pergola Paola Rossi Maria C Silveri PubMed Raffaella I Rumiati Francesco Foroni Giulio Pergola Paola Rossi Maria C Silveri Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.