Abstract

The knowledge on the features of the English varieties is essential to understand the differences and similarities of the varieties for second language teaching and learning, either for general proficiency (EGP) or English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classes. This paper demonstrates a corpus-based comparison of the lexical features between an ESP variety (Engineering English) and a General English (GE). Two corpora are used in the study; the Engineering English Corpus (EEC) acts as the representation of the specialized language, and the British National Corpus (BNC) as the General English (GE). The analyses are conducted by employing the WordList functions of a linguistic software – Wordsmith. Discussions on the differences (or similarities) of these two corpora include general statistics, text coverage and vocabulary size. The empirical findings in this study highlight the general lexical features of both corpora. The analyses verify that the Engineering English has less varied vocabulary, but higher text coverage than the GE; in other words, most of the words are used repeatedly throughout the EEC. Thus, this study further emphasizes the importance of corpus-based lexical investigations in providing empirical evidences for language description.

Highlights

  • The study of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) language features, in particular the lexical features, facilitates ESP teaching and learning

  • These and other questions related to descriptions of word use in a language lead to answers, which are essential to ensure the effectiveness of second language teaching and learning, for either general proficiency (EGP) or English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classes

  • This study demonstrates a corpus-based comparison of the general lexical features of an ESP variety (Engineering English) and a General English (GE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) language features, in particular the lexical features, facilitates ESP teaching and learning. Bowker and Pearson (2002) claim that apart from the obvious attribute of an ESP, i.e. specialized vocabulary, another salient feature of an ESP is the distinctive ways of combining words and arranging information that are different from GE. This includes collocations and stylistic features (Sadeghi & Nobakht, 2014). These and other questions related to descriptions of word use in a language lead to answers, which are essential to ensure the effectiveness of second language teaching and learning, for either general proficiency (EGP) or English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classes

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.