Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the lexical errors made by EFL students. The technique for eliciting information employed was an achievement test. A sample of 30 Saudi female students was asked to write essays in English that were assessed by the researcher. The students were all majoring in English in the third year at King Khalid University. James (1998) taxonomy was selected as the most comprehensive framework for the analysis of the lexical errors in the students' writing. A total of 137 lexical errors were identified and analysed. These errors were divided into formal 117 (85.40) and semantic 20 (14.60). Formal mis- selection 54 (39.42) was the most frequent major category of lexical formal errors while mis-formation 15 (10.95) was the least frequent one. Confusion of sense relations 14 (10.22) was the most frequent among lexical semantic errors. At the individual level of lexical formal errors, the most problematic words for students were the vowel based types 24 (17.52) and borrowing and blending were not problematic at all. At the individual level of lexical semantic errors, the most problematic words for students were near synonyms 8 (5.84) and the least problematic words were general terms for specific ones and overtly specific terms 1 (0.73).Pedagogical implications for teaching vocabulary to EFL learners and recommendations for areas for further research were suggested.

Highlights

  • Lexical knowledge is one of the essential components in language learning

  • At the individual level of lexical semantic errors, the most problematic words for students were near synonyms 8 (5.84) and the least problematic words were general terms for specific ones and overtly specific terms 1 (0.73).Pedagogical implications for teaching vocabulary to EFL learners and recommendations for areas for further research were suggested

  • The findings indicated that formal mis-formation category recorded the highest score for Yemeni undergraduate students, while formal mis-selection, and the mis-selection of prefix type, recorded the least score

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lexical knowledge is one of the essential components in language learning. Limited vocabulary and wrong choice of lexical items are major obstacles in successful communication. Schmitt (2000) states that “Lexical knowledge is central to communicative competence and to the acquisition of the second language” Folse (2004) states that, “with poor vocabulary, communication is constraint considerably. Investigating lexical errors helps teachers to be aware of the source of these errors and address them in class. James (1998) developed a lexical error taxonomy that consists of two major categories, formal and semantic. The formal errors are classified into 3 major categories which in turn are divided into 12 subcategories. The semantic errors are divided into 2 major categories which are in turn subdivided into 4 subcategories

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call